Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-70
98 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-80
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Below is a complete analysis of the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh WG-70, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-25 was brought out 12 years prior to the WG-70 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the FE-25 scores versus the WG-70 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-25 & Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-25 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Ricoh WG-70
| FE-25 | WG-70 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus FE-25
| WG-70 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2020 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 134 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 112k | Sharper display (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh WG-70
| FE-25 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-25 provides outside dimensions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh WG-70 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the FE-25 vs the WG-70.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the FE-25 and WG-70 is 98 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching specifications. The graphic underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-25 and WG-70.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-70 to provide you with more detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The older FE-25 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-07 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.4 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 112 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $15 | $280 |