Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung HZ35W
98 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650
Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Olympus FE-25 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the FE-25 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is pretty well matched and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FE-25 was brought out 17 months earlier than the HZ35W which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the FE-25 matches up against the HZ35W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-25 & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-25 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Samsung HZ35W
FE-25 | HZ35W |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus FE-25
HZ35W | FE-25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2010 | January 2009 | More modern by 17 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 614k | 112k | Sharper screen (+502k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Samsung HZ35W
FE-25 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-25 has got physical dimensions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-25 versus Samsung HZ35W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the FE-25 compared to the HZ35W.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-25 and HZ35W is 98 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The image underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-25 and HZ35W.
All in all, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Samsung HZ35W to give you more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged FE-25 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Olympus FE-25 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus FE-25 | Samsung HZ35W |
Also called | - | WB650 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-01-07 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | - | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 112k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $15 | $300 |