Olympus FE-25 vs Sony A390
98 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus FE-25 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Older Model is Sony A380
Olympus FE-25 vs Sony A390 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus FE-25 vs Sony A390, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and A390 (14MP) and the FE-25 (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FE-25 was launched 18 months before the A390 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the FE-25 scores versus the A390 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus FE-25 vs Sony A390 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-25 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The complete galleries are available at Olympus FE-25 Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Sony A390
FE-25 | A390 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus FE-25
A390 | FE-25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2010 | January 2009 | Fresher by 18 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 112k | Crisper screen (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Sony A390
FE-25 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus FE-25 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus FE-25 provides outside measurements of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-25 vs Sony A390 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the FE-25 versus the A390.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-25 and A390 is 98 and 66 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-25 and A390.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The FE-25 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A390 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older FE-25 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-25 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-25 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus FE-25 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus FE-25 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2009-01-07 | 2010-07-28 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | - | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | () | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.4 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 112k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 549 grams (1.21 pounds) |
Dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $15 | $500 |