Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
97 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 108g - 93 x 56 x 18mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. The resolution of the FE-3010 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe FE-3010 was revealed 4 years before the TG-820 iHS and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-3010 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the FE-3010 matches up vs the TG-820 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-3010 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-3010 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-3010 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| FE-3010 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus FE-3010
| TG-820 iHS | FE-3010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 37 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-3010 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| FE-3010 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-3010 provides physical measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 108 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has sizing of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the FE-3010 versus the TG-820 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-3010 and TG-820 iHS is 97 and 92 respectively.
Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-3010 and TG-820 iHS.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels so you should expect similar quality of images although you have to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The older FE-3010 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Olympus FE-3010 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-3010 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 108 grams (0.24 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $140 | $500 |