Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
97 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0ed8/e0ed852c676dcf5cca69873fd065bab3f3131ad6" alt="Olympus FE-3010 front Olympus FE-3010 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 108g - 93 x 56 x 18mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus FE-3010 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the FE-3010 (12MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The FE-3010 was released 5 years before the TG-830 iHS which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-3010 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the FE-3010 scores against the TG-830 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-3010 & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-3010 Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-3010 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
FE-3010 | TG-830 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus FE-3010
TG-830 iHS | FE-3010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 48 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-3010 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
FE-3010 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-3010 enjoys outside dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 108 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-3010 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the FE-3010 against the TG-830 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07f56/07f56aff666841e34b808ce6d8a990142e9ecd18" alt="Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-3010 and TG-830 iHS is 97 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4814/a481493b84ff9d1b8c86a8e8ffd730dac2fbe37a" alt="Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by going over specs. The picture here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-3010 and TG-830 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus TG-830 iHS to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged FE-3010 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69e5a/69e5a0e829279e218e23b7d9d2bd5f344d395115" alt="Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c99df/c99df00ba5bf0d97406912c5ca8faa827a24150f" alt="Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus FE-3010 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus FE-3010 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus FE-3010 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-01-07 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 108 gr (0.24 pounds) | 214 gr (0.47 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $140 | $0 |