Olympus FE-3010 vs Panasonic ZS200
97 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus FE-3010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 108g - 93 x 56 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Announced February 2018
- Alternative Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS100
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-3010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus FE-3010 vs Panasonic ZS200, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the FE-3010 (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the FE-3010 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") use different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FE-3010 was introduced 10 years prior to the ZS200 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-3010 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the FE-3010 matches up versus the ZS200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-3010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-3010 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-3010 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-3010 over the Panasonic ZS200
| FE-3010 | ZS200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus FE-3010
| ZS200 | FE-3010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2018 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 110 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1240k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+1010k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-3010 and Panasonic ZS200
| FE-3010 | ZS200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus FE-3010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-3010 offers outer measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 108 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has proportions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") along with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Check the Olympus FE-3010 vs Panasonic ZS200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the FE-3010 compared to the ZS200.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-3010 and ZS200 is 97 and 86 respectively.
Olympus FE-3010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching a spec sheet. The pic below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-3010 and ZS200.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The FE-3010 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Panasonic ZS200 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged FE-3010 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-3010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus FE-3010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
| Olympus FE-3010 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus FE-3010 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
| Other name | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-07 | 2018-02-13 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,240k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 108g (0.24 pounds) | 340g (0.75 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 370 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $140 | $800 |