Clicky

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27
Olympus FE-4000 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs

Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Also Known as X-925
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus E-M1 II, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Pro Mirrorless and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The FE-4000 was launched 8 years before the E-M1 II and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the FE-4000 matches up vs the E-M1 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 FE-4000 E-M1 II 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus FE-4000

 E-M1 II FE-4000 
IntroducedSeptember 2016July 2009Fresher by 87 months
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kClearer display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus E-M1 II

 FE-4000 E-M1 II 

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 features outer dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has specifications of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).

Check the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus E-M1 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the FE-4000 versus the E-M1 II.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and E-M1 II is 95 and 68 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over specs. The visual below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4000 and E-M1 II.

All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The FE-4000 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography highlights
21
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
76
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus FE-4000
Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
55
lighter than competition (136g)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
78
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
features focus via touch
environment sealing
lighter than average (574 grams)
very good ISO range (25,600)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Sports photography advice
Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography advice
17
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
75
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
environment sealing
supports phase detect autofocus
not so great battery power (350 per charge)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
62
lighter than competition (136g)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
72
lighter than average (574 grams)
environment sealing
features focus via touch
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
not so great battery power (350 per charge)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
28
reasonably wide (26mm)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
76
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
has double storage slots
not so great battery power (350 CIPA)
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Vlogging factors
Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging factors
28
reasonably wide (26mm)
lighter than competition (136 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
does not have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have microphone port
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect autofocus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
comes with microphone port
lighter than average (574g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus E-M1 II
 Olympus FE-4000Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus FE-4000 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Also Known as X-925 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Pro Mirrorless
Introduced 2009-07-22 2016-09-19
Body design Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III TruePic VIII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW support
Minimum boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 121
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 26-105mm (4.0x) -
Highest aperture f/2.6-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 3cm -
Total lenses - 107
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Highest silent shutter speed - 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 60.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 9.10 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 640x480 4096x2160
Video data format Motion JPEG MOV, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 136g (0.30 pounds) 574g (1.27 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 80
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.8
DXO Low light rating not tested 1312
Other
Battery life - 350 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLH-1
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots
Storage slots 1 Two
Pricing at launch $130 $1,700