Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also Known as X-925
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus E-M1 II, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Pro Mirrorless and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FE-4000 was launched 8 years before the E-M1 II and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the FE-4000 matches up vs the E-M1 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The complete galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FE-4000 | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus FE-4000
E-M1 II | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | July 2009 | Fresher by 87 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus E-M1 II
FE-4000 | E-M1 II |
---|
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 features outer dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has specifications of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Check the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus E-M1 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the FE-4000 versus the E-M1 II.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and E-M1 II is 95 and 68 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over specs. The visual below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4000 and E-M1 II.
All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The FE-4000 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Also Known as | X-925 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 60.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MOV, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 136g (0.30 pounds) | 574g (1.27 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | 1 | Two |
Pricing at launch | $130 | $1,700 |