Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b162/7b162df3ec790c8fdeb836e01efa7053559c47f1" alt="Olympus FE-4000 front Olympus FE-4000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Other Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are built by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The FE-4000 was released 9 years before the E-PL9 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the FE-4000 matches up against the E-PL9 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4000 & Olympus PEN E-PL9. The complete galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus E-PL9
FE-4000 | E-PL9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus FE-4000
E-PL9 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 104 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus E-PL9
FE-4000 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-4000 has got outside measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL9 has proportions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the FE-4000 compared to the E-PL9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17a2e/17a2eb744bec25e33a9172cb8301acced286c49b" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and E-PL9 is 95 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a956/5a956466ddccab130293d7345e443ac2993b8250" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over specs. The picture below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4000 and E-PL9.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The FE-4000 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus E-PL9 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ec55/1ec55691965a985e0f87bcd450edf0216b8478d5" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1169/b1169d93478390b21399c20d5a0f270c2d7d8bff" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Otherwise known as | X-925 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2018-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.6 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 136g (0.30 pounds) | 380g (0.84 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $130 | $599 |