Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-11
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Released July 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-11 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-11, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. The resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the SZ-11 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-4000 was revealed 24 months earlier than the SZ-11 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the FE-4000 matches up vs the SZ-11 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-11 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4000 & Olympus SZ-11. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Olympus SZ-11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus SZ-11
| FE-4000 | SZ-11 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Olympus FE-4000
| SZ-11 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus SZ-11
| FE-4000 | SZ-11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-11 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4000 provides exterior dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-11 has dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-11 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the FE-4000 compared to the SZ-11.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and SZ-11 is 95 and 89 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-11 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4000 and SZ-11.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus SZ-11 to produce greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The older FE-4000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-11 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-11 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus SZ-11 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus SZ-11 |
| Also called as | X-925 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2011-07-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136g (0.30 lb) | 226g (0.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $130 | $253 |