Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
89 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Launched January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus SZ-16 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and SZ-16 iHS (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-4000 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the SZ-16 iHS which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the FE-4000 scores versus the SZ-16 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
| FE-4000 | SZ-16 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus FE-4000
| SZ-16 iHS | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 42 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS
| FE-4000 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 enjoys physical measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-16 iHS has specifications of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus SZ-16 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the FE-4000 vs the SZ-16 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and SZ-16 iHS is 95 and 89 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing a spec sheet. The image here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4000 and SZ-16 iHS.
Clearly, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus SZ-16 iHS to offer greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS |
| Also called as | X-925 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lb) | 226 gr (0.50 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $130 | $230 |