Clicky

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 9000

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27
Olympus FE-4000 front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Alternate Name is X-925
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • Other Name is mju 9000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 9000 Overview

Following is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and both are produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is very close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The FE-4000 was launched 3 months after the 9000 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the FE-4000 grades against the 9000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus 9000

 FE-4000 9000 

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus FE-4000

 9000 FE-4000 

Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus 9000

 FE-4000 9000 
RevealedJuly 2009May 2009Same age
Focus manually No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display measurement
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4000 enjoys exterior dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

See the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus 9000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the FE-4000 and the 9000.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and 9000 is 95 and 92 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing specs. The picture here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4000 and 9000.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you should factor the launch date of the cameras into account.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Portrait photography info
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography info
21
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
21
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus FE-4000
Street photography with Olympus 9000
55
lighter than competition (136g)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than average in class (225 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Sports photography advice
Olympus 9000 Sports photography advice
17
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus 9000 as a Travel photography camera
62
lighter than competition (136 grams)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse function
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
58
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (225g)
low MP (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus 9000 Landscape photography highlights
28
reasonably wide (26mm)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
32
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual control
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Vlogging factors
Olympus 9000 Vlogging factors
28
reasonably wide (26mm)
lighter than competition (136g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external microphone socket
27
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
no external mic jack
heavier than average in class (225g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus 9000
 Olympus FE-4000Olympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus FE-4000 Olympus Stylus 9000
Otherwise known as X-925 mju 9000
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-07-22 2009-05-14
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 50
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-105mm (4.0x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.6-5.9 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing distance 3cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 5.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 136g (0.30 lb) 225g (0.50 lb)
Physical dimensions 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $130 $300