Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SH-2
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-1
- Updated by Olympus SH-3
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus SH-2, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and SH-2 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-4000 was released 6 years earlier than the SH-2 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the FE-4000 grades against the SH-2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4000 & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus SH-2
| FE-4000 | SH-2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus FE-4000
| SH-2 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2015 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 68 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus SH-2
| FE-4000 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-4000 has external dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus SH-2 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus SH-2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the FE-4000 and the SH-2.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and SH-2 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The graphic below will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and SH-2.
As you can tell, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus SH-2 to produce more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The older FE-4000 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
| Alternative name | X-925 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2015-03-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.5 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136 gr (0.30 pounds) | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $130 | $399 |
