Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Other Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Released August 2012
- Replaced the Olympus SP-820UZ
- Later Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview
Below is a extended review of the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus SP-820UZ, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the SP-820UZ (14MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-4000 was unveiled 4 years before the SP-820UZ and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the FE-4000 scores versus the SP-820UZ in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 & Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
| FE-4000 | SP-820UZ |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Olympus FE-4000
| SP-820UZ | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 37 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus SP-820UZ
| FE-4000 | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 comes with outer measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus SP-820UZ has specifications of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus SP-820UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the FE-4000 versus the SP-820UZ.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and SP-820UZ is 95 and 69 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through specifications. The graphic here should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4000 and SP-820UZ.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus SP-820UZ to render greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images more aggressively. The older FE-4000 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ |
| Other name | X-925 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 22-896mm (40.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.4-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 15.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lbs) | 485 gr (1.07 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $130 | $299 |
