Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b162/7b162df3ec790c8fdeb836e01efa7053559c47f1" alt="Olympus FE-4000 front Olympus FE-4000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus TG-860, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and TG-860 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The FE-4000 was announced 6 years prior to the TG-860 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the FE-4000 grades versus the TG-860 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The whole galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus TG-860
FE-4000 | TG-860 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus FE-4000
TG-860 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 67 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-860
FE-4000 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-4000 has got outer measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus TG-860 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the FE-4000 against the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89537/895375ac2aab47a9fdcff4736bc3da0ebfaba443" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and TG-860 is 95 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/514dd/514dd212e2ebeb02053c4b8d2ea60d4e18120e2a" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing just by looking at specifications. The graphic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4000 and TG-860.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Olympus TG-860 to resolve extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d908d/d908daca14984cd49d5056b4704954a764926cf7" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c805/3c805ef0e09111c455b8cfd5db2ed7692ed98084" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Also Known as | X-925 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 136 grams (0.30 pounds) | 224 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $130 | $279 |