Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-320
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Also referred to as X-925
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FE-4000 was announced 3 years before the TG-320 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the FE-4000 matches up versus the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus TG-320
| FE-4000 | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus FE-4000
| TG-320 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-320
| FE-4000 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal display measurement |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-4000 has external dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the FE-4000 vs the TG-320.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and TG-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and TG-320.
To sum up, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to produce greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older FE-4000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Also called | X-925 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 136 grams (0.30 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $130 | $0 |
