Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-925
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and both are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe FE-4000 was brought out 3 years prior to the TG-820 iHS which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the FE-4000 scores vs the TG-820 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| FE-4000 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus FE-4000
| TG-820 iHS | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| FE-4000 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-4000 offers physical dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the FE-4000 against the TG-820 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and TG-820 iHS is 95 and 92 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The picture here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can tell, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you will want to take the age of the cameras into account. The more aged FE-4000 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography advice
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
has face detection focusing
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Street photography camera
lighter than competitors in class (136g)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 Sports photography features
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography features
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking autofocus
weather proofing
max fps very slow (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (220 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competitors in class (136g)
flash built-in
relatively wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
weather proofing
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery life (220 shots)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
relatively wide (26mm)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse function
really wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
no manual control
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
terrible battery life (220 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging factors
relatively wide (26mm)
lighter than competitors in class (136g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
no external mic socket
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Alternate name | X-925 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 136 grams (0.30 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $130 | $500 |