Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-830 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-4000 was announced 4 years earlier than the TG-830 iHS and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the FE-4000 matches up versus the TG-830 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| FE-4000 | TG-830 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus FE-4000
| TG-830 iHS | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 42 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| FE-4000 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 has got physical measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-830 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the FE-4000 and the TG-830 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and TG-830 iHS is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out specifications. The graphic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4000 and TG-830 iHS.
Plainly, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-830 iHS to provide greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older FE-4000 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Also referred to as | X-925 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136 grams (0.30 lb) | 214 grams (0.47 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $130 | $0 |