Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also Known as X-925
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-4000 was revealed 3 years earlier than the TG-1 iHS which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the FE-4000 scores vs the TG-1 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4000 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
FE-4000 | TG-1 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus FE-4000
TG-1 iHS | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2012 | July 2009 | More modern by 34 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 610k | 230k | Crisper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
FE-4000 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4000 provides outer measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus TG-1 iHS has measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus TG-1 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the FE-4000 vs the TG-1 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and TG-1 iHS is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The image below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4000 and TG-1 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution and you can expect similar quality of images although you will want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Also referred to as | X-925 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $130 | $399 |