Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Other Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly well matched and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-4000 was launched 4 years before the TG-2 iHS and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the FE-4000 grades versus the TG-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4000 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| FE-4000 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus FE-4000
| TG-2 iHS | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 47 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| FE-4000 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4000 has outside dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the FE-4000 compared to the TG-2 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and TG-2 iHS is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution so you can expect similar quality of files though you need to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The older FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Otherwise known as | X-925 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136g (0.30 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $130 | $380 |