Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-3
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus TG-4
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus TG-3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and TG-3 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-4000 was brought out 5 years prior to the TG-3 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the FE-4000 matches up against the TG-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus TG-3
| FE-4000 | TG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus FE-4000
| TG-3 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 57 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-3
| FE-4000 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4000 has outer dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-3 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus TG-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the FE-4000 and the TG-3.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and TG-3 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and TG-3.
Clearly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Olympus TG-3 to offer greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Also Known as | X-925 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lb) | 247 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $130 | $350 |
