Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-4
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- New Model is Olympus TG-5
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe FE-4000 was unveiled 6 years prior to the TG-4 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the FE-4000 scores against the TG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The full galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus TG-4
| FE-4000 | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus FE-4000
| TG-4 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 69 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-4
| FE-4000 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4000 has got exterior measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the FE-4000 and the TG-4.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and TG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The graphic below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4000 and TG-4.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-4 to offer greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Also called as | X-925 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lb) | 247 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $130 | $379 |
