Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as X-925
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras and they are both produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly similar but the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-4000 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the FE-4000 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| FE-4000 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus FE-4000
| XZ-2 iHS | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 41 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| FE-4000 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4000 comes with physical measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the FE-4000 versus the XZ-2 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and XZ-2 iHS is 95 and 85 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by reading specs. The visual here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4000 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have the same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizing. The FE-4000 uses the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field more difficult. The older FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Also Known as | X-925 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 136 grams (0.30 lbs) | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $130 | $450 |