Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b162/7b162df3ec790c8fdeb836e01efa7053559c47f1" alt="Olympus FE-4000 front Olympus FE-4000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Additionally referred to as X-925
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") posses different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The FE-4000 was manufactured 9 years before the ZS200 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the FE-4000 grades vs the ZS200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Panasonic ZS200
FE-4000 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus FE-4000
ZS200 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 104 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+1010k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Panasonic ZS200
FE-4000 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4000 features outside dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") along with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the FE-4000 versus the ZS200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79b83/79b8366034be457e0101867a0b557a3fa79c5f83" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and ZS200 is 95 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56fe3/56fe37d2176ab57e3081128ea7600fff46ad7ed2" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and ZS200.
As you can see, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The FE-4000 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Panasonic ZS200 will resolve extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79536/79536f2e5a4e487aaf5b5bae0fa086f6471b5d07" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99862/998624ab7b6b11773c4e35ad7023422022e39158" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also called as | X-925 | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-07-22 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 136 gr (0.30 pounds) | 340 gr (0.75 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $130 | $800 |