Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic 3D1
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
93 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic 3D1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 193g - 108 x 58 x 24mm
- Launched November 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic 3D1 Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Olympus FE-4000 and Panasonic 3D1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the 3D1 (12MP) is fairly comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FE-4000 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the 3D1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the FE-4000 grades versus the 3D1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic 3D1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Panasonic 3D1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Panasonic 3D1
| FE-4000 | 3D1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic 3D1 over the Olympus FE-4000
| 3D1 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2011 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 27 months |
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Panasonic 3D1
| FE-4000 | 3D1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic 3D1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4000 enjoys external measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Panasonic 3D1 has measurements of 108mm x 58mm x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-4000 and Panasonic 3D1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the FE-4000 versus the 3D1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and 3D1 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic 3D1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes merely by checking out technical specs. The image underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4000 and 3D1.
As you have seen, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of files although you will need to take the age of the cameras into account. The more aged FE-4000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic 3D1 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 |
| Also Known as | X-925 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2011-11-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.9-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Full Touch Screen with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136 grams (0.30 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 108 x 58 x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $130 | $670 |