Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FX75
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Released June 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus FE-4000 versus Panasonic FX75, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is very close and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FE-4000 was announced 10 months prior to the FX75 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the FE-4000 scores versus the FX75 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Panasonic FX75
| FE-4000 | FX75 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus FE-4000
| FX75 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2010 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 10 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Panasonic FX75
| FE-4000 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display measurement |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-4000 has got exterior dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-4000 versus Panasonic FX75 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the FE-4000 against the FX75.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and FX75 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The pic underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and FX75.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Panasonic FX75 to render extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also called as | X-925 | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2010-06-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 7.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lb) | 165 gr (0.36 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $130 | $139 |