Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b162/7b162df3ec790c8fdeb836e01efa7053559c47f1" alt="Olympus FE-4000 front Olympus FE-4000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2340e/2340e2ff65ce46367e3d311e4c5a1941a6541467" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 front"
63 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 606g - 130 x 97 x 118mm
- Launched July 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and FZ70 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The FE-4000 was released 5 years before the FZ70 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ70 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the FE-4000 scores vs the FZ70 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70. The complete galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Panasonic FZ70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Panasonic FZ70
FE-4000 | FZ70 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ70 over the Olympus FE-4000
FZ70 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 48 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Panasonic FZ70
FE-4000 | FZ70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4000 provides outside measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ70 has measurements of 130mm x 97mm x 118mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 4.6") with a weight of 606 grams (1.34 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the FE-4000 versus the FZ70.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3248/b3248918d226b91f2aaaacd340386b69e458e788" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 size comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and FZ70 is 95 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31a43/31a43378eee23cac186c92b148f2809593f9aee2" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at technical specs. The photograph here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4000 and FZ70.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Panasonic FZ70 to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5da00/5da000427d7bce0640f0bb5e37378cdb2f8b7530" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3da7b/3da7b06aecb156efd3435b1f7d5ab4d8938e3d1f" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FZ70 Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 |
Also called as | X-925 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2013-07-18 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 13.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (50i/60i, 25p/30p), 1280 x 720p (50p/60p or 25p/30p), 640 x 480 (25p/30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 136g (0.30 pounds) | 606g (1.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 130 x 97 x 118mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 41 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 171 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $130 | $300 |