Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF2
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
88 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Also Known as X-925
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 310g - 113 x 68 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Succeeded the Panasonic GF1
- Newer Model is Panasonic GF3
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF2 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus FE-4000 versus Panasonic GF2, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the GF2 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and GF2 (Four Thirds) have different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FE-4000 was brought out 19 months prior to the GF2 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the FE-4000 grades vs the GF2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Panasonic GF2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Panasonic GF2
| FE-4000 | GF2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF2 over the Olympus FE-4000
| GF2 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 19 months | |
| Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Panasonic GF2
| FE-4000 | GF2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF2 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-4000 features outer dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF2 has proportions of 113mm x 68mm x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") with a weight of 310 grams (0.68 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-4000 versus Panasonic GF2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the FE-4000 versus the GF2.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and GF2 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The picture below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and GF2.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature the identical MP albeit different sensor sizes. The FE-4000 features the tinier sensor which should make getting shallow DOF more challenging. The more aged FE-4000 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF2 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 |
| Also Known as | X-925 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2011-02-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136g (0.30 pounds) | 310g (0.68 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 113 x 68 x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 54 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 506 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $130 | $330 |