Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b162/7b162df3ec790c8fdeb836e01efa7053559c47f1" alt="Olympus FE-4000 front Olympus FE-4000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27fce/27fced1b30df29f9c1d9c26f1646ff64695d521a" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 front"
90 Imaging
54 Features
62 Overall
57
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 266g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
- Released February 2016
- Superseded the Panasonic GF7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and GF8 (16MP) and the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and GF8 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The FE-4000 was launched 7 years prior to the GF8 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the FE-4000 grades vs the GF8 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Panasonic GF8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Panasonic GF8
FE-4000 | GF8 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF8 over the Olympus FE-4000
GF8 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 79 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Panasonic GF8
FE-4000 | GF8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4000 has got external dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF8 has sizing of 107mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 266 grams (0.59 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the FE-4000 compared to the GF8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d1aa/4d1aa40c87a7da4948bf4b8b7039f4c9aa67c563" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 size comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and GF8 is 95 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0c11/f0c119150e38697badc7768d671cf069d3d729f8" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching specs. The picture below might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and GF8.
All in all, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The FE-4000 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic GF8 will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69b90/69b905defa2f5e3428d6b27906878a18ef266962" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e05ab/e05ab5c97bac3e7e691bb14d2562b95709b9dbe3" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic GF8 Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 |
Also called | X-925 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2016-02-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3448 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/500 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 50p, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lbs) | 266 gr (0.59 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3-shot/10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $130 | $549 |