Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Other Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2011
Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the WG-1 GPS (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FE-4000 was manufactured 3 years before the WG-1 GPS and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the FE-4000 grades against the WG-1 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 & Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
FE-4000 | WG-1 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Olympus FE-4000
WG-1 GPS | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | July 2009 | Fresher by 25 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Pentax WG-1 GPS
FE-4000 | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display size | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4000 comes with external dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Pentax WG-1 GPS has sizing of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the FE-4000 versus the WG-1 GPS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and WG-1 GPS is 95 and 93 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out specs. The graphic below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4000 and WG-1 GPS.
All in all, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-1 GPS to provide extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older FE-4000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
Also called | X-925 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $130 | $350 |