Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX3
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is very close and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FE-4000 was brought out 10 months prior to the CX3 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the FE-4000 matches up vs the CX3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 & Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh CX3
| FE-4000 | CX3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Olympus FE-4000
| CX3 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 10 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh CX3
| FE-4000 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4000 enjoys outer dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the FE-4000 and the CX3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and CX3 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4000 and CX3.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus FE-4000 to render greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observationsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Also called | X-925 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136g (0.30 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $130 | $329 |
