Clicky

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
17
Overall
27
Olympus FE-4000 front
 
Ricoh GR front
Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs

Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Also Known as X-925
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Launched April 2013
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR II
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR Overview

In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus FE-4000 versus Ricoh GR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The FE-4000 was manufactured 4 years before the GR and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the FE-4000 grades against the GR with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh GR

 FE-4000 GR 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus FE-4000

 GR FE-4000 
LaunchedApril 2013July 2009Fresher by 45 months
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kCrisper display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh GR

 FE-4000 GR 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4000 has external measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check out the Olympus FE-4000 versus Ricoh GR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the FE-4000 against the GR.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and GR is 95 and 90 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking specifications. The graphic here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4000 and GR.

Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The FE-4000 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh GR will give greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh GR Portrait photography advice
20
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
74
has manual focus
high flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Street photography factors
Ricoh GR Street photography factors
55
lighter than average in class (136 grams)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
74
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition (245g)
very good ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Sports photography features
Ricoh GR Sports photography features
17
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
45
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
max frames per second very slow (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Travel photography features
Ricoh GR Travel photography features
61
lighter than average in class (136g)
has built in flash
decently wide (26mm)
no Timelapse function
low megapixels (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
71
lighter than competition (245g)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus FE-4000
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR
27
decently wide (26mm)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Timelapse function
61
has manual focus
nice screen size (3 inch)
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GR as a Vlogging camera
28
decently wide (26mm)
lighter than average in class (136g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
does not feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
no external microphone port
30
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (245 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
doesn't have microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh GR
 Olympus FE-4000Ricoh GR
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus FE-4000 Ricoh GR
Also referred to as X-925 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-07-22 2013-04-17
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 4928 x 3264
Max native ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-105mm (4.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/2.6-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focusing range 3cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 300 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 136 grams (0.30 pounds) 245 grams (0.54 pounds)
Dimensions 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 78
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 972
Other
Battery life - 290 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - DB65
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD, SDHC, SDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $130 $971