Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27


90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also Known as X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Launched April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus FE-4000 versus Ricoh GR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

The FE-4000 was manufactured 4 years before the GR and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the FE-4000 grades against the GR with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4000 & Ricoh GR. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh GR
FE-4000 | GR |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus FE-4000
GR | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 45 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh GR
FE-4000 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4000 has external measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-4000 versus Ricoh GR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the FE-4000 against the GR.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and GR is 95 and 90 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking specifications. The graphic here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4000 and GR.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The FE-4000 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh GR will give greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh GR |
Also referred to as | X-925 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 300 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 136 grams (0.30 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $130 | $971 |