Clicky

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
17
Overall
27
Olympus FE-4000 front
 
Ricoh GR III front
Portability
90
Imaging
68
Features
62
Overall
65

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs

Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Alternate Name is X-925
Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2018
  • Old Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Newer Model is Ricoh GR III
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III Overview

Following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and GR III (24MP) and the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The FE-4000 was manufactured 10 years earlier than the GR III which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the FE-4000 grades versus the GR III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh GR III

 FE-4000 GR III 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus FE-4000

 GR III FE-4000 
LaunchedSeptember 2018July 2009More modern by 111 months
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1037k230kCrisper screen (+807k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh GR III

 FE-4000 GR III 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4000 enjoys outer dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR III has measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the FE-4000 vs the GR III.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and GR III is 95 and 90 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The pic here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and GR III.

As you can tell, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The FE-4000 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Ricoh GR III will result in more detail due to its extra 12MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 will be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Portrait photography features
Ricoh GR III Portrait photography features
20
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
80
you can focus manually
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Street photography info
Ricoh GR III Street photography info
55
lighter than competitors (136g)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
84
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
offers focus via touch
lighter than competitors (257g)
good ISO range (102,400)
fixed screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR III as a Sports photography camera
17
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
75
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
includes tracking focus
sensor has phase detect AF
can't change focal length (28mm)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR III as a Travel photography camera
61
lighter than competitors (136 grams)
has built in flash
quite wide (26mm)
missing Timelapse mode
resolution not great (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
69
lighter than competitors (257g)
offers focus via touch
good megapixels (24MP)
missing Time Lapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Landscape photography info
Ricoh GR III Landscape photography info
27
quite wide (26mm)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
69
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
doesnt have low pass filter
good ISO range (102,400)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
missing Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Vlogging details
Ricoh GR III Vlogging details
28
quite wide (26mm)
lighter than competitors (136g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
missing microphone support
37
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (257 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly display
missing mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh GR III
 Olympus FE-4000Ricoh GR III
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus FE-4000 Ricoh GR III
Also called as X-925 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-07-22 2018-09-25
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 24MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 1600 102400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-105mm (4.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/2.6-5.9 f/2.8-16
Macro focus distance 3cm 6cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.00 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 136 grams (0.30 pounds) 257 grams (0.57 pounds)
Dimensions 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $130 $900