Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Old Model is Ricoh GR III
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR III
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and GR III (24MP) and the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FE-4000 was manufactured 10 years earlier than the GR III which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the FE-4000 grades versus the GR III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4000 & Ricoh GR III. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh GR III
| FE-4000 | GR III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus FE-4000
| GR III | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2018 | July 2009 | More modern by 111 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh GR III
| FE-4000 | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4000 enjoys outer dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR III has measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the FE-4000 vs the GR III.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and GR III is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The pic here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and GR III.
As you can tell, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The FE-4000 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Ricoh GR III will result in more detail due to its extra 12MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh GR III |
| Also called as | X-925 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2018-09-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.8-16 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 136 grams (0.30 pounds) | 257 grams (0.57 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $130 | $900 |