Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
85 Imaging
33 Features
48 Overall
39
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2010
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FE-4000 was unveiled 12 months earlier than the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the FE-4000 matches up against the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
FE-4000 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Olympus FE-4000
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2010 | July 2009 | Newer by 12 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
FE-4000 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 enjoys external dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the FE-4000 vs the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 95 and 85 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4000 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Clearly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus FE-4000 to offer you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Otherwise known as | X-925 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-07-22 | 2010-08-06 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 136g (0.30 lb) | 367g (0.81 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $130 | $147 |