Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively well matched but the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-4000 was released 7 months earlier than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the FE-4000 grades versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| FE-4000 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus FE-4000
| GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2010 | July 2009 | Fresher by 7 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| FE-4000 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4000 has got outer measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the FE-4000 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 95 and 85 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to see the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking specs. The graphic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4000 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The FE-4000 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus FE-4000 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
| Alternative name | X-925 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2010-03-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.5-4.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lb) | 355 gr (0.78 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 410 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $130 | $349 |