Clicky

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
17
Overall
27
Olympus FE-4000 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Alternative Name is X-925
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Launched March 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively well matched but the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The FE-4000 was released 7 months earlier than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the FE-4000 grades versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 FE-4000 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus FE-4000

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC FE-4000 
LaunchedMarch 2010July 2009Fresher by 7 months
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 FE-4000 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4000 has got outer measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

See the Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the FE-4000 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 95 and 85 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is tough to see the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking specs. The graphic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4000 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The FE-4000 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus FE-4000 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Portrait photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography info
20
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
36
manual focus
delivers RAW files
does not have liveview
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Street photography details
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography details
55
lighter than competitors (136 grams)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competitors (355 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Sports photography details
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography details
17
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not have liveview
slow fps (2.0 frames per second)
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Travel photography information
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography information
61
lighter than competitors (136g)
has built in flash
rather wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.6)
60
lighter than competitors (355 grams)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
low MP (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus FE-4000
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
27
rather wide (26mm)
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
47
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not have liveview
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging highlights
28
rather wide (26mm)
lighter than competitors (136 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic jack
28
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (355 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus FE-4000Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus FE-4000 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Alternative name X-925 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2009-07-22 2010-03-18
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-105mm (4.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.6-5.9 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus distance 3cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.00 m 4.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 136 gr (0.30 lb) 355 gr (0.78 lb)
Dimensions 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 410 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $130 $349