Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh PX
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released August 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus FE-4000 versus Ricoh PX, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and PX (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe FE-4000 was launched 3 years prior to the PX and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a simple overview of how the FE-4000 grades against the PX in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4000 & Ricoh PX. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh PX
| FE-4000 | PX |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus FE-4000
| PX | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 25 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh PX
| FE-4000 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4000 has got physical dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Ricoh PX has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-4000 versus Ricoh PX in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the FE-4000 against the PX.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and PX is 95 and 95 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by going over specifications. The photograph below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4000 and PX.
Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh PX to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh PX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh PX |
| Also Known as | X-925 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136g (0.30 lbs) | 156g (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $130 | $329 |
