Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27


91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-30, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The FE-4000 was manufactured 6 years before the WG-30 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the FE-4000 matches up against the WG-30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 & Ricoh WG-30. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh WG-30
FE-4000 | WG-30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus FE-4000
WG-30 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 63 months |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-30
FE-4000 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4000 enjoys physical dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-30 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the FE-4000 compared to the WG-30.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and WG-30 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading through specifications. The image underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and WG-30.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-30 to give more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh WG-30 |
Also called as | X-925 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2014-10-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 136g (0.30 pounds) | 192g (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $130 | $428 |