Clicky

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27
Olympus FE-4000 front
 
Ricoh WG-30 front
Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs

Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Alternative Name is X-925
Ricoh WG-30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Released October 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-30, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The FE-4000 was manufactured 6 years before the WG-30 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the FE-4000 matches up against the WG-30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh WG-30

 FE-4000 WG-30 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus FE-4000

 WG-30 FE-4000 
ReleasedOctober 2014July 2009More modern by 63 months

Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-30

 FE-4000 WG-30 
Manual focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent display measurements
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4000 enjoys physical dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-30 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the FE-4000 compared to the WG-30.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and WG-30 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading through specifications. The image underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and WG-30.

To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-30 to give more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Portrait photography information
Ricoh WG-30 Portrait photography information
21
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
36
MP count good (16 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Street photography advice
Ricoh WG-30 Street photography advice
55
lighter than competitors (136g)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
62
image stabilization (Digital)
weather proof
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Sports photography features
Ricoh WG-30 Sports photography features
17
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
45
image stabilization (Digital)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proof
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus FE-4000
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-30
62
lighter than competitors (136g)
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.6)
71
weather proof
MP count good (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
does not have selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-30 as a Landscape photography camera
28
really wide (26mm)
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
43
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
weather proof
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Vlogging info
Ricoh WG-30 Vlogging info
28
really wide (26mm)
lighter than competitors (136 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone port
33
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
offers face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-30
 Olympus FE-4000Ricoh WG-30
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus FE-4000 Ricoh WG-30
Also called as X-925 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2009-07-22 2014-10-09
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-105mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/2.6-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range 3cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m 3.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 136g (0.30 pounds) 192g (0.42 pounds)
Dimensions 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $130 $428