Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27


90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The FE-4000 was introduced 5 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the FE-4000 scores versus the WG-4 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4000 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
FE-4000 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus FE-4000
WG-4 GPS | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 55 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
FE-4000 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 provides physical dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the FE-4000 against the WG-4 GPS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and WG-4 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The photograph below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to resolve greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Also referred to as | X-925 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 136 gr (0.30 pounds) | 235 gr (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $130 | $210 |