Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FE-4000 was introduced 5 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the FE-4000 scores versus the WG-4 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4000 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| FE-4000 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus FE-4000
| WG-4 GPS | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | July 2009 | More recent by 55 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| FE-4000 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 provides physical dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the FE-4000 against the WG-4 GPS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and WG-4 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The photograph below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to resolve greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Also referred to as | X-925 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 136 gr (0.30 pounds) | 235 gr (0.52 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $130 | $210 |