Clicky

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
17
Overall
27
Olympus FE-4000 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs

Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Additionally referred to as X-925
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Launched February 2014
  • Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The FE-4000 was introduced 5 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the FE-4000 scores versus the WG-4 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 FE-4000 WG-4 GPS 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus FE-4000

 WG-4 GPS FE-4000 
LaunchedFebruary 2014July 2009More recent by 55 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 FE-4000 WG-4 GPS 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 provides physical dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the FE-4000 against the WG-4 GPS.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and WG-4 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The photograph below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and WG-4 GPS.

As you can tell, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to resolve greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Portrait photography features
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Portrait photography features
20
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
41
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
features face detect focusing
no manual control
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus FE-4000
Street photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
55
lighter than competition (136 grams)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than others (235 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus FE-4000
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
17
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
features tracking focus
environment sealing
low fps (2.0 fps)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery (240 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Travel photography camera
61
lighter than competition (136 grams)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
69
environment sealing
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
not so great battery (240 shots)
heavier than others (235 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Landscape photography camera
27
reasonably wide (26mm)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
54
has manual focus
fairly wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
not so great battery (240 CIPA)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Vlogging information
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Vlogging information
28
reasonably wide (26mm)
lighter than competition (136g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have mic support
34
fairly wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
doesn't have mic support
heavier than others (235 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
 Olympus FE-4000Ricoh WG-4 GPS
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus FE-4000 Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Also referred to as X-925 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Announced 2009-07-22 2014-02-05
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-105mm (4.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.6-5.9 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus range 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.00 m 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 136 gr (0.30 pounds) 235 gr (0.52 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 photos
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots One One
Retail cost $130 $210