Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27


90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-6

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus FE-4000 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The FE-4000 was introduced 6 years prior to the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the FE-4000 scores against the WG-5 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4000 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
FE-4000 | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus FE-4000
WG-5 GPS | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 67 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
FE-4000 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4000 has got outer measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-4000 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the FE-4000 compared to the WG-5 GPS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and WG-5 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to see the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4000 and WG-5 GPS.
As you can see, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to deliver greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Also Known as | X-925 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-07-22 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 14.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lbs) | 236 gr (0.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $130 | $500 |