Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-70
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27


91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- New Model is Ricoh WG-80

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Olympus FE-4000 versus Ricoh WG-70, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The FE-4000 was released 11 years prior to the WG-70 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the FE-4000 grades against the WG-70 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-70. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh WG-70
FE-4000 | WG-70 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus FE-4000
WG-70 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 128 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-70
FE-4000 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4000 has physical measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4000 versus Ricoh WG-70 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the FE-4000 against the WG-70.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and WG-70 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking a spec sheet. The visual below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4000 and WG-70.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-70 to give you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh WG-70 |
Also Known as | X-925 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2020-02-04 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | On, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $130 | $280 |