Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63bd5/63bd549202ff236b9bc86cddba608e6a029457e0" alt="Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Released February 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5
- Replacement is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the WG-1 GPS (14MP) is pretty close but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and WG-1 GPS (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M5 II was revealed 3 years after the WG-1 GPS which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-1 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M5 II scores against the WG-1 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-M5 II | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | August 2011 | Newer by 43 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Olympus E-M5 II
WG-1 GPS | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-M5 II | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II has exterior measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Pentax WG-1 GPS has specifications of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M5 II vs the WG-1 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9047a/9047a0c584f4e0bc264a87e42c0aae3ff1292c11" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and WG-1 GPS is 80 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/487bd/487bd9dfd8cbd22f12461382b54162f2c9d1917b" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The picture here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 II and WG-1 GPS.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M5 II will render more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 II provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b685c/b685c4cc83025c8e5274c1b5bd50d1bf6f84e518" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/992b4/992b45771bf46c1e300e4f422b04fe21978ad198" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469 gr (1.03 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 260 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $699 | $350 |