Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as X-925
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FE-4000 was introduced 6 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the FE-4000 scores versus the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4000 & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| FE-4000 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus FE-4000
| WG-M1 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 62 months |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-M1
| FE-4000 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-4000 comes with physical measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the FE-4000 against the WG-M1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and WG-M1 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The visual here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4000 and WG-M1.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to render extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The older FE-4000 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Other name | X-925 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $130 | $2,000 |