Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung GX-1S
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced January 2006
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung GX-1S, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) use different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FE-4000 was brought out 3 years after the GX-1S which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the FE-4000 grades versus the GX-1S with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4000 & Samsung GX-1S. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Samsung GX-1S
| FE-4000 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2009 | January 2006 | More modern by 43 months | |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 210k | Clearer screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Olympus FE-4000
| GX-1S | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung GX-1S
| FE-4000 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 comes with outer measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has specifications of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung GX-1S in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the FE-4000 compared to the GX-1S.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and GX-1S is 95 and 68 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes simply by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4000 and GX-1S.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The FE-4000 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus FE-4000 will give you greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher FE-4000 should have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung GX-1S |
| Also Known as | X-925 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2006-01-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136 grams (0.30 lbs) | 605 grams (1.33 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $850 |