Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ25W
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Additionally Known as WB5000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus FE-4000 versus Samsung HZ25W, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is very close and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FE-4000 was released 11 months earlier than the HZ25W which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the FE-4000 grades vs the HZ25W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung HZ25W. The complete galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Samsung HZ25W
| FE-4000 | HZ25W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus FE-4000
| HZ25W | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2010 | July 2009 | Fresher by 11 months | |
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung HZ25W
| FE-4000 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4000 features exterior dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Samsung HZ25W has sizing of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-4000 versus Samsung HZ25W in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the FE-4000 compared to the HZ25W.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and HZ25W is 95 and 70 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and HZ25W.
Clearly, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of pictures though you will need to take the release date of the cameras into account. The older FE-4000 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also called | X-925 | WB5000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 136 gr (0.30 pounds) | 428 gr (0.94 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $130 | $350 |