Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ50W
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
70 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Released May 2010
- Other Name is WB5500
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung HZ50W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is pretty close and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FE-4000 was unveiled 9 months before the HZ50W so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the FE-4000 matches up against the HZ50W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4000 & Samsung HZ50W. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Samsung HZ50W
| FE-4000 | HZ50W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus FE-4000
| HZ50W | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2010 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 9 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung HZ50W
| FE-4000 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4000 features outside measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Samsung HZ50W has sizing of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung HZ50W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the FE-4000 against the HZ50W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and HZ50W is 95 and 70 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through specifications. The picture here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4000 and HZ50W.
To sum up, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung HZ50W to result in more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung HZ50W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung HZ50W |
| Otherwise known as | X-925 | WB5500 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2010-05-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136 grams (0.30 lbs) | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $130 | $250 |