Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB350F
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27


90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally referred to as X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung WB350F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The FE-4000 was released 5 years earlier than the WB350F which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the FE-4000 grades versus the WB350F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 & Samsung WB350F. The complete galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Samsung WB350F
FE-4000 | WB350F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus FE-4000
WB350F | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 54 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung WB350F
FE-4000 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 offers external measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has specifications of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung WB350F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the FE-4000 and the WB350F.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and WB350F is 95 and 90 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by looking at specifications. The image below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4000 and WB350F.
To sum up, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung WB350F to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung WB350F |
Also Known as | X-925 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 136 grams (0.30 lbs) | 276 grams (0.61 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $130 | $260 |