Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB850F
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
91 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Here is a extended overview of the Olympus FE-4000 versus Samsung WB850F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and WB850F (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-4000 was announced 3 years before the WB850F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a short introduction of how the FE-4000 matches up vs the WB850F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4000 & Samsung WB850F. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Samsung WB850F
| FE-4000 | WB850F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Olympus FE-4000
| WB850F | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung WB850F
| FE-4000 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4000 comes with outer dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB850F has measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-4000 versus Samsung WB850F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the FE-4000 and the WB850F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and WB850F is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and WB850F.
Clearly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Samsung WB850F to give greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung WB850F |
| Also Known as | X-925 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136g (0.30 pounds) | 250g (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $130 | $599 |