Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df25a/df25aa9816ff75de9ec5c01cb9e2891c99ee04df" alt="Olympus FE-4030 front Olympus FE-4030 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus E-M10 II, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are built by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the E-M10 II (16MP) is very close but the FE-4030 (1/2.3") and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) posses different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The FE-4030 was launched 6 years prior to the E-M10 II which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the FE-4030 matches up against the E-M10 II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus E-M10 II
FE-4030 | E-M10 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus FE-4030
E-M10 II | FE-4030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 68 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus E-M10 II
FE-4030 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4030 provides outer dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 II has sizing of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus E-M10 II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the FE-4030 vs the E-M10 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80929/80929c65fc120ff1dfca2646ebf08fd960296ebc" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4030 and E-M10 II is 95 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25ca2/25ca2792817607e88313f09036e97fca1031ba24" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specs. The picture below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4030 and E-M10 II.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The FE-4030 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged FE-4030 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97fe1/97fe1bd59925deef176ff6f319f1d07fc32fa95b" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eafbe/eafbeebc63ee1ae061a2d3d82c9d0a21d65c9cc7" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-01-07 | 2015-08-25 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 146g (0.32 lb) | 390g (0.86 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $130 | $499 |