Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus SH-3
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Older Model is Olympus SH-2
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus SH-3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the SH-3 (16MP) is very close and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FE-4030 was unveiled 7 years before the SH-3 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the FE-4030 matches up versus the SH-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus SH-3
| FE-4030 | SH-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus FE-4030
| SH-3 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 74 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus SH-3
| FE-4030 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4030 has got exterior measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Olympus SH-3 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus SH-3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the FE-4030 compared to the SH-3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4030 and SH-3 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by viewing specifications. The visual here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4030 and SH-3.
Plainly, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus SH-3 to render extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The older FE-4030 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2016-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 4cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 11.5 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 146g (0.32 pounds) | 271g (0.60 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $579 |