Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-870
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Older Model is Olympus TG-860
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus TG-870, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the TG-870 (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-4030 was revealed 7 years earlier than the TG-870 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the FE-4030 matches up vs the TG-870 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus TG-870
| FE-4030 | TG-870 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus FE-4030
| TG-870 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2016 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 73 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus TG-870
| FE-4030 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4030 has physical measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Olympus TG-870 has sizing of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus TG-870 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the FE-4030 and the TG-870.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4030 and TG-870 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing just by checking a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4030 and TG-870.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-870 to give more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older FE-4030 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2016-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 146g (0.32 pounds) | 221g (0.49 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $130 | $280 |