Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-10
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus FE-4030 versus Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FE-4030 was revealed 4 years prior to the XZ-10 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the FE-4030 matches up against the XZ-10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4030 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus XZ-10
| FE-4030 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus FE-4030
| XZ-10 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 37 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus XZ-10
| FE-4030 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4030 provides exterior measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-4030 versus Olympus XZ-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the FE-4030 compared to the XZ-10.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4030 and XZ-10 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The image below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4030 and XZ-10.
Clearly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus FE-4030 to provide greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images more aggressively. The more aged FE-4030 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2013-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 4cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 146g (0.32 lbs) | 221g (0.49 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $130 | $428 |